An Agreement Reached By Adjustment Of Conflicting Or Opposing Claims

The Mediator could also discuss encouraging the parties to focus on their own expectations, in relation to what the opposing party wants and how to achieve them both, instead of trying to bring them both to the centre. Since conflicts and disagreements are natural experiences in everyone`s lives, the search for a solution through “mutual promise” is natural and commendable. Nowhere is this truer and more real than in the institutions of marriage and family prescribed by God. And when conflicts arise that do not heal themselves, the power and responsibility to act as arbiters act by the parents and especially by the Father who carries the priesthood. I hope that the compromise within the family will be motivated and moderated by love. If one or more family members do not compromise in the name of their “freedom of choice”, but try to follow their own path, it is pure and simple selfishness. Frustrations may also be present with regard to the realization that the counterparty has only made concessions to appease the other party. Compromise is defined as the settlement of disputes through mutual concessions; an agreement concluded by the adaptation of claims, principles, contradictory or contradictory principles, etc., by the mutual modification of claims. As a rule, in a compromise, the two parties mutually agree on concessions. Even in a compromise, both sides usually give up some of what they want and neither side gets everything they want. Another advantage of compromise is that it allows the parties to focus on their concerns in prioritizing their needs and fully understand the interests of the other party. This makes it possible to remove at least some of the concerns and interests of both parties and to formulate the agreements in such a way that they keep face or, where appropriate, emphasize must-haves.

Wallace F. Bennett, U.S. Senator from Utah (retired) Before answering this question, we need to learn the true meaning of the word “compromise,” which is “a mutual promise.” It rightly describes an agreement reached through mutual concessions or an acceptable adaptation between conflicting ideas or desires. It may also require the presence of a third party or a non-interested party as an arbitrator. A compromise is important and works for both sides when both sides have fully communicated their concerns and it is convenient to reach an agreement. A complete understanding of the other`s views can help the parties find that it is useful for the parties to admit certain points. While there may be some differences of opinion that are non-negotiable on both sides, a well-discussed compromise allows the parties to prioritize their interests and create a clear understanding of the other party`s perspective, which can ultimately help them find a solution. .

. .

This entry was posted in Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.